This bugs me, though, because it doesn't really prove much. Of *course* eating nothing but McDonald's for a month straight is bad for you. But you could eat something healthy - say, apples - nothing but apples for a month, or broccoli, or chicken breasts - and you would have a whole variety of *other* things wrong with you. Somebody then could used that skewed logic to say that apples or broccoli or chicken is bad for you.
We already knew that McDonald's is generally not good food for us and should be consumed only occasionally...this doesn't prove anything but that this guy is a turd, imo.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-01-23 09:28 pm (UTC)We already knew that McDonald's is generally not good food for us and should be consumed only occasionally...this doesn't prove anything but that this guy is a turd, imo.